Breaking News : Judge Indira Talwani prevents Trump from terminating the immigration program from the Biden administration…..
District Judge Indira Talwani issued a temporary injunction preventing the Trump administration from ending the humanitarian parole program for migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. This program, established during President Biden’s tenure, had granted approximately 530,000 individuals temporary legal status to live and work in the United States ackground of the CHNV Program
In early 2023, the Biden administration introduced the CHNV humanitarian parole program to address the surge of migrants from these four countries. The initiative allowed nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to enter the U.S. legally, aiming to reduce illegal border crossings and enhance vetting processes. By the end of August 2024, approximately 530,000 individuals had entered the U.S. under this program
However, in January 2025, President Trump issued an executive order terminating the program, directing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke the legal status of those who had entered under its provisions. DHS set a deadline of April 24, 2025, for these individuals to depart the country or face deportation.Judge Talwani’s Ruling
Judge Talwani’s decision came in response to a lawsuit filed by advocacy groups, including the Justice Action Center, on behalf of the affected migrants. The plaintiffs argued that the blanket termination of parole status violated due process rights and the rule of law.
In her ruling, Judge Talwani emphasized that the administration’s approach lacked individualized assessments for each migrant, stating that the revocation of parole without such reviews would lead to “severe consequences,” including family separations and potential returns to unsafe conditions. She described the administration’s decision as presenting a “Hobson’s choice” between returning to the countries they fled or remaining in the U.S. without legal status, thereby losing opportunities for future legal adjustments citeturn0search0.
Reactions to the Decision
Immigrant rights organizations hailed the ruling as a victory for justice and human rights. Karen Tumlin of the Justice Action Center praised the decision, highlighting the program’s humanitarian benefits and its role in fostering community integration.
Conversely, officials from the Trump administration criticized the injunction, arguing that it oversteps judicial authority and undermines executive power over immigration enforcement. They contended that the decision disrupts efforts to manage border security and uphold immigration laws.Legal and Political Implications
Judge Talwani’s injunction temporarily halts the revocation of legal status for the affected migrants but does not permanently reinstate the CHNV program. The case is expected to proceed through the courts, potentially reaching the U.S. Supreme Court for a final determination on the legality of the program’s termination.
This legal battle underscores the ongoing tensions between the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy and the judiciary’s role in protecting individual rights. The outcome will have significant implications for future immigration programs and the treatment of migrants in the U.S. Conclusion
Judge Indira Talwani’s temporary injunction represents a significant legal challenge to the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle the CHNV humanitarian parole program. While the decision does not permanently restore the program, it provides temporary relief to hundreds of thousands of migrants and sets the stage for continued legal proceedings that will shape the future of U.S. immigration policy.
